Turn public data into public power — for Memphis’s children.

Memphis-Shelby County Schools is under state takeover. A Board of Managers has been appointed. 901 Education shows what they’re inheriting, where the greatest needs are concentrated, and how the community should measure their success — every figure sourced, dated, and compared to the state and our own trajectory.

A sister dashboard to 901justice — education outcomes and justice-system contact are tightly linked.

Where We Stand

Mixed Sources

Here’s where we are. Here’s what we inherited. Baseline conditions for Memphis-Shelby County Schools, 2025-26 — every figure compared to the state and to our own trajectory.

The Pipeline: 100 Students Enter Kindergarten…

Every section of this dashboard maps to a stage in this pipeline. Each bar shows how many of 100 MSCS kindergartners reach the milestone.

Enter kindergarten100 of 100
Regularly attending in K–378 of 100
Reading on grade level by 3rd grade24 of 100
On track in 9th grade74 of 100
Graduate in 4 years81 of 100
Graduate ‘Ready’29 of 100
Enroll in college or training within 1 year47 of 100

Hypothetical cohort built from the most recent rate at each stage — not a single tracked class. Sources shown on hover.

Academic Outcomes — K through 12

Mixed Sources

Our kids are growing. The system isn’t giving them enough to grow into.

ELA proficiency (grades 3–8) — MSCS vs. Tennessee

Source: TDOE TCAP Assessment Files. 2019-20 canceled and 2020-21 disrupted by COVID; treat those years with caution.

TVAAS growth composite — how much students grew vs. expectation

Source: TDOE TVAAS District Composites. 2020-21 not rated (COVID). Level 5 = significantly above expected growth.

Why both charts matter — the core tension

TVAAS measures whether students learned more than predicted given where they started — and current MSCS student growth is rated at the state’s highest level, though recent results have varied. Proficiency measures whether students are on grade level — and most MSCS students are not, because the starting point is so far behind. Tennessee’s accountability formula weights proficiency heavily, so the district is penalized in state ratings even while its kids grow faster than anywhere else in the state. Our children are running faster than ever. The finish line is still too far. That’s a resource problem, not a performance problem.

Who the system serves: ELA proficiency by student group

MSCS is 93% students of color and 80%+ economically disadvantaged. State comparisons embed that composition as a disadvantage rather than an equity challenge to be funded. Hover a bar for each group’s share of enrollment.

Black
22.3%
Hispanic
25.5%
White
53%
Asian
63.9%
Native American
36.4%
Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander
32.4%
Economically disadvantaged
18.6%
Students with disabilities
6%
English learners
20.7%

Source: TDOE TCAP Assessment File, 2025-26 (grades 3-8 ELA). Suppressed values shown as suppressed, never estimated.

Chronic absenteeism (missing 10%+ of school days) — lower is better

Source: TDOE Chronic Absenteeism Files. COVID years labeled in tooltip; absenteeism remains far above the 2018-19 baseline.

Out-of-school suspension rate
12.9%vs 5.5% statewide

Suspended students lose instructional time and are far more likely to enter the justice system.

Black students among suspensions
87.3%vs 73.6% of enrollment

The disparity between suspension share and enrollment share is the school-climate equity signal.

Referrals to law enforcement
842

The explicit education-to-justice pipeline link — see the 901justice dashboard for where it leads. TDOE Discipline Data 2024-25; CRDC 2020-21 (law-enforcement referrals).

4-year graduation rate — MSCS vs. Tennessee

Source: TDOE Graduation Cohort Data (4-year cohort denominator).

Ready Graduate rate (ACT ≥21 + career/college credential)

Source: TDOE Ready Graduate Files. Graduating is not the same as graduating ready.

Average ACT composite — MSCS
17.3

TDOE ACT Data, 2024-25

Tennessee average
19.4
National average
19.5

Board of Managers Accountability

Sample Data

The board has the power. These are the numbers they’ll be judged by — the baseline they inherit, defined before anyone can redefine it after the fact.

Baseline Scorecard — Year Zero (2024-25)

MetricBaselineSourceWhy the board answers for it
3rd grade ELA proficiency23.8%TDOE TCAP District File, 2025Primary reading accountability metric
Graduation rate (4-yr)81.3%TDOE Cohort Data, 2025Completion benchmark
Ready Graduate rate28.7%TDOE Ready Graduate, 2025College/career readiness
TVAAS composite (5-level)Level 5TDOE TVAAS District, 2025Growth under their governance
Chronic absenteeism rate23.4%TDOE Chronic Absenteeism, 2025Engagement + access signal
Black-White proficiency gap (ELA)36.3 ptsTDOE TCAP + CRDC, 2025Equity measure
Teacher retention rate84.1%TDOE Teacher Retention, 2025Workforce stability
Per-pupil expenditure$12,874TDOE Finance Data, 2025Investment accountability
Out-of-school suspension rate12.9%TDOE Discipline Data, 2025School climate
Post-secondary enrollment rate47.2%TDOE Post-Secondary, 2023Pipeline output

Baseline values freeze at the Board of Managers’ Year Zero and update annually as TDOE releases new files. The accountability framing is advocacy content from Stand for Children Tennessee, clearly labeled as such — not neutral reporting.

What success looks like — defined proactively

Year 1
  • Stabilize enrollment decline
  • Establish a transparent public data reporting cadence
  • Address the teacher vacancy crisis
Year 2
  • Increase 3rd grade ELA proficiency by ≥3 percentage points
  • Reduce chronic absenteeism by ≥5 points
Year 3
  • Close the Black-White proficiency gap by a measurable margin
  • Achieve a graduation rate at or above the state average
Ongoing
  • Maintain TVAAS Composite 4 or 5 (high growth)
  • Increase the Ready Graduate rate annually

Structural accountability questions the community should keep asking

  • Is the board publishing regular data reports accessible to the public?
  • Is community input being meaningfully incorporated in major decisions?
  • Are school improvement resources following the schools with greatest need?
  • Are disciplinary practices equitable across race and disability status?
  • Is the charter sector being held to the same accountability standards as zone schools?